Readings for line KD.10.281α

L.10.294KD.10.281α
Dum cecus ducit cecum ambo in foueam cadunt
M.10.294KD.10.281α
Dum cecus ducit cecum ambo in foueam cadunt
Cr1.10.292KD.10.281α
Dum cecus ducit cecum , ambo in foueam cadunt .
W.10.294KD.10.281α
Dum cecus ducit cecum ambo in foueam cadunt           W.10.294:nota
Hm.10.294KD.10.281α
Dum ..cecus ducit cecum · ambo in foueam cadunt · & cetera ·
C.10.292KD.10.281α
Dum cecus ducit cecum · ambo in foueam cadunt
G.11.294KD.10.281α
dum cecus ducit cecum ambo In foueam cadunt //
O.10.294KD.10.281α
Dum cecus ducit cecum ambo in foueam caduntO.10.294: This line is written in the right margin. It is divided after ambo, and a red parasign precedes the second line of text.
R.10.297KD.10.281α
Dum secus[c]ecus ducit secum[c]ecumR.10.297: This slip (secus for cecus / caecus) cannot be owed to the scribe's own pronunciation of Latin (in which the voiceless velar plosive /k/ of classical phonology would have been rendered, as was conventional in ecclesiastical Latin, as the voiceless palato-alveolar affricate /č/). Instead, this mental lapse reveals momentary confusion with English phonology, where initial <c> often represented the voiceless alveolar fricative /s/. No other B copyist makes this mistake.  ambo in fouiam cadunt .
F.7.296KD.10.281α
Dum cecus ducit cecum  ambo in foueam cadunt.