Readings for line KD.11.297

L.11.299KD.11.297
Þat hath no londe ne lynage riche · ne good loos of his handes
M.11.298KD.11.297
That hath no londesM.11.298: M alone among B manuscripts attests the plural. ne lynage riche  ne good loos of hise handes
Cr1.11.298KD.11.297
That hath no land ne linage riche ne good loos of hys handes
W.11.299KD.11.297
That haþ no lond ne lynage riche . ne good loos of hise handes           W.11.299:nota
Hm.12.174KD.11.297
that hath no londe nor lynage · ryche ne good los of his hondys ·
C.11.298KD.11.297
That has no land ne lynage riche · negoodne good loos of hise handes
G.12.300KD.11.297
þat hathe no land ne lynage ryche ne good loos off hys handes
O.11.300KD.11.297
Þat haþ no loond ne lynage riche  ne good loos of hise handis
R.11.310KD.11.297
Þat hath noþerR.11.310: Beta reads no; the P family of C agrees with this beta lection, but the X family reading matches alpha's noþer. lond ne lynage R.11.310: R's lynage shows an alpha error of omission (F = lyflode); cf. beta's lynage riche, which is also the reading of Cx.ne gode los of his hondes .
F.8.301KD.11.297
Þat haþ neyþir lond ne lyflodeF.8.301: F's lyflode is unique. Bx has lynage. Beta and C manuscripts follow lynage with riche, but it is absent in alpha. / ne good loos of his hondis.