L.14.141KD.14.131α L.14.141-144: A possible erasure appears in the left margin? Dormierunt & nichil inuenerunt
L.14.142KD.14.131α And in an other stede also · velud sompnum surgencium domine
in ciuitate tua & ad nichilum rediges
M.14.143KD.14.131αAnd in a-nother stede also . Velud sompnum surgencium domine
In ciuitate tua . & ad nichilum rediges
Cr1.14.141KD.14.131α Dormierunt et nihil inuenieruntinuenerunt .
Cr1.14.142KD.14.131α And in an other stede also , Uelut sompnum surgentium domine
Cr1.14.143KD.14.131α In ciuitate tua et ad nichillum rediges ,
W.14.141KD.14.131α And in anoþer stede also . velud sompnum surgencium
domine in Ciuitate tua et ad nichilum rediges &c
Hm.14.141KD.14.131α Velud sompnumHm.14.141: The error for sompnium appears in all B manuscripts except F. surgencium domine in ciuitate tua · & ad nichilum rediges · cetera
C.14.139KD.14.131α dormierunt & nichil inuenerunt .
C.14.140KD.14.131α And in an other stede also ˜ velut sompnium surgencium domine in
C.14.141KD.14.131α Ciuitate tua & ad nichilum rediges
O.14.140KD.14.131αDormierunt & nichil inueneruntO.14.140: This line is written in the right margin. It is divided after nichil, so that it appears as two lines.
O.14.141KD.14.131αAnd in an-oþer stede also . velut sompnum surgencium domine in ciuitate tuaO.14.141: OC2RF alone lack et before ad. ad nichilum rediges
R.14.144KD.14.131α
in ciuitate tua ad nichilum
eorum redigesR.14.144: R's eorum is a unique addition to this
citation. .
F.10.611KD.14.131αDormierunt & nichil inuenerunt . et alibiF.10.611: F uniquely adds et alibi. . Velud sompnium surgencium domine in ciuitate tua adF.10.611: Alpha and OC2 lack beta's et before ad. nichillum rediges ymaginem.