Readings for line KD.14.140

L.14.151KD.14.140
So I segge by ȝow riche · it semeth nouȝt þat ȝe shulle
M.14.152KD.14.140
So I segge by ȝyow riche . it semeth not þat ȝye shulle
Cr1.14.152KD.14.140
So I say by you ryche , it semeth not that ye should
W.14.150KD.14.140
So I seye by yow riche . it semeþ noȝt þat ye shulle
Hm.14.150KD.14.140
So y se..ye byy ȝow ryche · it semeþ nougth that ȝe schulde
C.14.150KD.14.140
So I saye by yow riche ˜ it semes nouȝt þat ye shull
G.15.149KD.14.140
so I say by you ryche ytt semethe noght þat ye shall
O.14.150KD.14.140
So I segge bi ȝow riche  it semeþ not þat ȝe schul 
R.14.153KD.14.140
¶ So I segge be ȝow riche  it semethR.14.153: R parallels beta but omits nouȝt after semeth, completely inverting the intended sense of the assertion (beta's version is vouched for by Cx). F rewrites the line. þat ȝe schulle .
F.10.620KD.14.140
Be ryche men yt semeþ ryght soo / þe same þat ȝee shulle. F's reading is unique. Beta witnesses vary, though most read as follows:
So I seye by yow riche it semeþ noȝt þat ye shulle
Haue heuene in youre here beyng and heuene þerafter.
Alpha had the phrase "two hevenys," and it reappears in a revised line in C.