Readings for line KD.9.100α

+
L.9.106KD.9.100α
Qui offendit in verboL.9.106: LR alone have verbo, which explains the corrector's marginal <+>. Most other B manuscripts have vno, and F has vno verbo. in omnibus est reus
M.9.105KD.9.100α
Qui offendit in v..noM.9.105: M's altered reading vno agrees with most B manuscripts. LR read verbo; F reads vno verbo. in omnibus est reus
Cr1.9.105KD.9.100α
Qui offendit in vno , in omnibus est reus .
W.9.105KD.9.100α
Qui offendit in vno in omnibus est reus
Hm.9.106KD.9.100α
Qui offendit in vno in omnibus reus est · & cetera ·
C.9.102KD.9.100α
Qui offendit in vno est in omnibus reus
G.10.104KD.9.100α
qui offendit In vno In omnibus est reus : //
O.9.104KD.9.100α
Qui offendit in vno  est in omnibus reus
R.9.106KD.9.100α
Qui offendit in verboR.9.106: R's verbo is almost certainly authorial, albeit not an accurate Vulgate citation; L is the only other B witness that completely agrees with R, but M probably did originally (by erasure and correction M now reads vno). F tries to split the difference between alpha's verbo and the common beta reading, vno, by adopting a reading of vno verbo. in omnibus est reus .
F.6.230KD.9.100α
Qui offendit in vno verbo  in omnibus reus est.