Readings for line KD.12.200

L.12.200KD.12.200
As þo þat seten atte syde table · or with þe souereignes of þe halle
de latronibus pendentibus ad passionem domini
M.12.200KD.12.200
As þo þat sitten at þe side tablesM.12.200: Only M and Cr have plural tables. Kane and Donaldson erroneously record <-s> as possibly added.  or with þe soueraines of þe halle
Cr1.12.199KD.12.200
As thei þat sit at side tables , or with souereignis of þe hal
W.12.199KD.12.200
As þo þat seten at þe syde-table . or wiþ þe souereynes of þe halle           W.12.199:nota
Hm.12.506KD.12.200
as þo þat sytte at syde table · or wyþ þe souereyns of þe halle ·
C.12.200KD.12.200
As tho that sitten at the table · or with souereignes of the halle
G.13.201KD.12.200
as tho þat sytten at þe table wyth soueregnes yn the hall
O.12.201KD.12.200
As þoo þat sitten at þe table  or wiþ souereyns of þe halle
R.12.201KD.12.200
As þo þat sitten at þe side table  or with þe souereynes of þe halle .
F.9.317KD.12.200
As þey þat syttyn at þe tableF.9.317: F's omission of the alliterating stave syde before table is shared by GYOC2CB, probably reflecting the FG scribes' sense that a side table is not the place for the sovereign. The omission makes more sense in FG where or is omitted before with than in the other manuscripts that make the change. For other agreements among these manuscripts, see F9.176, 388. / with þe souereyn of þe place.