L.1.138KD.1.138 ¶ Ȝet haue I no kynde knowing quod I · ȝet mote ȝe kenne me better
M.1.139KD.1.138...Yet haue I no kynde knowynge quod I ...?...yet mote ye kenne me b....ettre
Cr1.1.137KD.1.138 I haue no kind knowing quod I , ye mote me ken better
W.1.138KD.1.138 ¶ YetW.1.138: The mark over line-initial <Y> resembling a nota abbreviation is to distinguish the letter from capital <Þ>. haue I no kynde knowyng quod I . ye mote kenne me bettre
C.1.135KD.1.138 yhet haue I no kynde knowyng quod I · yhet mote ye kene me bettre
O.1.136KD.1.138 ¶ Ȝit haue I no kynde knowyng quod I ȝit mote ȝe kenne me better
R.1.138KD.1.138
¶ I haueR.1.138:
For alpha's I haue, beta reads Ȝet haue I, which
is also the reading of Ax. However, the reading of alpha agrees with
that of Cx. no kende knowyng quatz I ȝette mote
I
lerneR.1.138:
Once more, R's (and alpha's) third stave was defective in alliteration; cf. beta's b-verse,
which offers ȝet mote ȝe kenne me to R's ȝette mote I lerne. Beta's reading agrees with that of the other two
versions. bettre .
F.2.134KD.1.138¶ I have no kyȝnde knowynge quod y y coueyte lerne bettre.F.2.134: Alpha is responsible for the b-verse. Beta manuscripts have "yet mote ye kenne me bettre." R reads "ȝette mote
I lerne bettre."