Readings for line KD.11.375

L.11.379KD.11.375
Why þow ne suwest man and his make · þat no mysfait hem folwe
M.11.378KD.11.375
Whi thow ne suwest man and his make  þat no mysfait hem folwe .
Cr1.11.378KD.11.375
Whi þou ne suiste man & his make , þat no misfeat hem folow
W.11.379KD.11.375
Why þow ne sewest man and his make . þat no mysfeet hem folwe
Hm.12.254KD.11.375
why þu ne suest man and his make · þat no mysfayte hem folwe ·
C.11.376KD.11.375
Why thow ne suwest man and his make þat na mysfaut hem folwe
G.12.380KD.11.375
whye þou ne sueste man & hys make þat þem no myssfayte folowe
O.11.380KD.11.375
Why þou ne sueste man & his make  þat no mysfayt hym folewe
R.11.390KD.11.375
Whi þow ne schewestR.11.390: Apparently, alpha failed to understand the meaning of suwest (cf. R11.350), and R reproduces his schewest; F once again improvises with makst. man and his make  þat no misfeithR.11.390: Bo and Cot appear to share R's reading here (their spelling is mysfaith); cf. F's myschef and beta's mysfait. R's form is probably intended to represent the same word as beta's (= ModEng misdeed); cf. the Introduction III.2.2.10 on evidence for R's occasional use of final <th> as a phonological and morphological equivalent to final <t>. hem folwe .
F.9.52KD.11.375
Þou makst man & his make / no myschef hem folwe.F.9.52: F has miscomprehended the sense here. Bx reads "Why þow ne sewest man and his make þat no mysfeet hem folwe." Alpha was quite possibly corrupt since R has schewest for sewest.