Readings for line KD.13.384

+
L.13.386KD.13.384
HaddeL.13.386: LR alone omit I after Hadde. The omission prompted the corrector's marginal <+>. neuere wille wot god · witterly to biseche
M.13.383KD.13.384
Hadde I neuere wille wot god . ..itturlicheM.13.383:The first letter of this word, which is written over an erasure, is illegible. All other B manuscripts read witterliche. to byseche .
Cr1.13.385KD.13.384
Hadde I neuer wyll wote god wytterly to beseche
W.13.385KD.13.384
Hadde I neuere wille woot god . witterly to biseche
Hm.13.383KD.13.384
had y neuere wyl god wote · wyttyrly to beseche ·
C.13.384KD.13.384
Had I neuere wille woot god witterly to biseche
G.14.386KD.13.384
I had neuer wyll woote god / wytterly to byseche
O.13.383KD.13.384
Hadde I neuere wille woot god  witterli to beseche 
R.13.400KD.13.384
HaddeR.13.400: After Hadde, R shares with L alone an obvious error: the omission of the personal pronoun I. Both F and beta include I, as does Cx. This apparently random error, shared exclusively by the two best witnesses to Bx, probably derives from an overlooked marginal correction in that archetypal copy, one that was transmitted faithfully (as a marginal) by both alpha and beta. nere wil wote god  witterly to be-seche .
F.10.395KD.13.384
Hadde y neuere wille god whot / witturly god by-sechen.