Readings for lines KD.13.54α-KD.13.55

L.13.56KD.13.54α-55
Et quorum tecta sunt peccata in a dissh
M [Not found.]
Cr1.13.56KD.13.54α-55
Et quorum tecta sunt peccata . in a dishe ,
W.13.56KD.13.54α-55
Et quorum tecta sunt peccata . in a dissh
Hm.13.56KD.13.54α-55
Et quorum tecta sunt peccata · & cetera yn a dysch ·
C.13.56KD.13.54α
Et quorum tecta sunt peccata · in a disshe
G.14.56KD.13.54α-55
et quorum tecta sunt peccata In a dysshe
O.13.56KD.13.54α-55
Et quorum tecta sunt  peccata . in a dische
R.13.50KD.13.54α-55
AndR.13.50: For R's And, F shows & (but in a completely rephrased line) while beta reads Et. quorum tecta sunt peccata  in a dische .R.13.50: R agrees with the beta manuscripts against F in attesting a line break between KD13.54α and KD13.55 after dische. Although this is impossible, and F correctly senses that Langland's alliterative pattern requires a line break immediately after the Latin quotation, it is much more likely that this represents one of F-redactor's many shrewd editorial guesses than that F alone here retains by vertical transmission the reading of Bx.
F.10.49KD.13.54α-55
& beatus vir cui non imputauit / in a plater a looF.10.49: The reading appears only in F. Bx reads "dissh of." Possibly luce, lus, "pike" lies behind loo.