Readings for line KD.15.230

L.15.243KD.15.230
And in a freres frokke · he was yfounde ones
M.15.239KD.15.230
And inM.15.239: The scribe has avoided a 2 cm slit in the parchment. No text has been lost. a Freres frokke . he was founden oones
Cr1.15.236KD.15.230
And in a Fryers froke he was found once
W.15.239KD.15.230
And in a freres frokke . he was yfounden ones
Hm.15.235KD.15.230
and yn a frerys frocke · he was foundyn onys
C.15.234KD.15.229.1
And clenliche yclothed in cipyrs · and in tarterine
C.15.235KD.15.230
And in a freres frokke he was yfounde oones
G.16.237KD.15.229.1
& clenlyche y-clothed In cypres & In tartaryne
G.16.238KD.15.230
and In a freres frocke he was fouvnde oonesce
O.15.237KD.15.229.1
And clenlich ycloþed  in cipres & in tartaryneO.15.237: Kane and Donaldson (223) exclude this line, which occurs only in GYOC2CB, on the grounds that it is scribal.
O.15.238KD.15.230
And in a freris frokke  he was founden onys
R.15.257KD.15.230
And in a frereR.15.257: R's frere (an unmarked genitive) is unique; all the other manuscripts read freres however, the preponderance of C evidence (most of the X family and some of the P family) supports R's reading. frocke  he was Ifounde ones .
F.11.246KD.15.230
& in a frerys frokke / he was y-fownden oones.