Readings for line KD.2.167

L.2.169KD.2.167
Tho haued notaries none · annoyed þei were
M.2.169KD.2.167
Tho h....ad þeM.2.169: M uniquely reads þe at this point, though the reading is shared with two A manuscripts. notaries none . annoyede thei were .
Cr1.2.169KD.2.167
Tho had Notaries none anoied they were
W.2.169KD.2.167
Tho hadde Notaries none . anoyed þei were
Hm.2.167KD.2.167
tho hadden notaryes none  a-noyȝed thei were ·
C.2.169KD.2.167
Tho had notaries non · anoyed they were
G.3.169KD.2.167
tho had notaryes non / anoyyd therewyth
O.2.168KD.2.167
Þoo hadden notaries noon  anoyed þei werenO.2.168: The letter <d> is rewritten above the line, apparently because the <d> in anoyed is spoiled by an inkblot.
R.2.128KD.2.167
Þo hauedR.2.128: Only manuscript L agrees with R's unusual verb form haued (common in the thirteenth century but nowhere cited in MED, s. v. haven, later than about 1330, except for Piers Plowman). Both F and the majority of beta copies read had(de). The same line appears in A, but Kane was not concerned to record such morphemic variations, regarding them all as accidentals. notaries none  anuyed þei were .
F.3.168KD.2.167
/ [¶] Þan Notarijs hadde noone / & a-noyed þey wheryn.