Readings for line KD.20.256α

L.20.256KD.20.256α
Qui numerat multitudinem stellarum · & omnibus eis &c
M.20.256KD.20.256α
Qui numerat multitudinem stellarum . & omnibus eis & cetera .
Cr1.20.255KD.20.256α
Qui numerat multitudinem stellarum & omnibus &cetera .
W.20.256KD.20.256α
Qui numerat multitudinem stellarum . et omnibus eis &c
Hm.20.256KD.20.256α
Qui numerat multitudinem stellarum & omnibus eis · & cetera
CHECK THE MS. INTENDED pOINTING HAND???***
C.20.254KD.20.256α
Qui numerat multitudines stellarum & omnibus eis nomina & cetera
G.21.254KD.20.256α
qui numerat multitudinem stellarum & omnibus eis & cetera
O.20.254KD.20.256α
Qui numerat multiudinem stellarumO.20.254: OR alone lack et omnibus eis after stellarum. & ceteraO.20.255: This line is written in the right margin. It is divided after numerat and a red parasign precedes the second line of text, which appears above the first.
R.20.229KD.20.256α
Quis numerat multitudinem stellarum .R.20.229: R's Quis is unique; all other B and C manuscripts read Qui. R's complete omission of much of this Latin citation is unique among the B witnesses; O shares R's gap for the initial part of the omission, a phrase that beta renders as & omnibus eis (cf. F's & omnia eis). The most interesting feature of the attestational array for the B manuscripts here is that the C-version's citation of this text agrees completely in its shape with that of R.
F.16.255KD.20.256α
Qvi numerat multitudinem stellarum  & omniaF.16.255: F's omnia is unique. Bx has omnibus. eis.F.16.255: Alpha is responsible for the omission of nomina vocat after eis.