Readings for line KD.5.476

L.5.488KD.5.476
For he had leyne bi latro · luciferes aunte
M.5.489KD.5.476
For he hadde l..eyne bi latro  luciferes aunte
Cr1.5.484KD.5.476
For he had leyne by Latro Lucifers aunte
W.5.486KD.5.476
For he hadde leyen by Latro . luciferis Aunte
Hm.5.489KD.5.476
for he hadde leyne by latro · lucyfers aunte ·
C.5.489KD.5.476
For he hadde leyn by latro lucifers aunte
G.6.486KD.5.476
for he had leynve by latro luvcyferes auvnte
O.5.490KD.5.476
For he hadde leyn bi latro  lucifers aunte
R.5.489KD.5.476
For he hathR.5.489: F omits this verb entirely and the beta copies render it in the past tense as had. Among the A and C manuscripts, only Vernon agrees with R's reading. The others support beta. Cf. the Introduction III.2.2.10 regarding R's problematic tense marking. leyne be latro  luciferes aunte .
F.5.482KD.5.476
& be-fore he lay with latro / luciferys Awnte.