Readings for line KD.16.136

L.16.143KD.16.136
Enuye and yuel wille · was in þe iewes
M.16.143KD.16.136
Enuye and .yuel wille . was in þe Iewes
Cr1.16.142KD.16.136
Enuye and euyl wyll was in the Iewes
W.16.143KD.16.136
Enuye and yuel wil . was in þe Iewes
Hm.16.142KD.16.136
Enuye and euyl wyl · was yn the iewes ·
C.16.105KD.16.136
Enuye and yuel · wille was In the Iewes
G.17.142KD.16.136
enuvy & yuvell wyll was yn þe Iewes
O.16.144KD.16.136
Enuye & yuele wille  was in þe Iues
R.16.142KD.16.136
Enuye and euel wil  arenR.16.142: R's aren is unique but outweighs the consensus of F and the beta copies (which have was) on account of the latter's defective alliteration. A majority of C manuscripts (= ern, preterite of rennen) also support this reading. See Kane and Donaldson, p. 186, for discussion of the forms. in þe iewes .
F.12.144KD.16.136
Boþe Envie & evil wyl / was a-mong þe Iewis.