fol. 125v (cont.)I
Passus quartus de visione ·
c
for he schal rewle my rewme · and rede me the besteHm.4.9: Kane-Donaldson supply the following line from Cr2-3OC2Y: Of Mede and of mo oþere, what man shal hire wedde.
fol. 126rI
Hm.4.12KD.4.13
¶ Y am fayn of þat forowarde · seyde the freke thanneHm.4.12: At this point, all other manuscripts contain three lines not found in Hm, here given in the spelling of L:
And ritte riȝte to resoun and rowneth in his ere
And seide as þe kynge badde and sithen toke his leue
I shal arraye me to ride quod resoun reste þe a while
. The omission was probably caused by eye-skip because both KD.4.14 and KD.4.17 begin with and. The mistake may have been easy to miss since the line still makes sense syntactically.
And ritte riȝte to resoun and rowneth in his ere
And seide as þe kynge badde and sithen toke his leue
I shal arraye me to ride quod resoun reste þe a while
. The omission was probably caused by eye-skip because both KD.4.14 and KD.4.17 begin with and. The mistake may have been easy to miss since the line still makes sense syntactically.
#
there are wyles in h.ere woordes · and wyth mede they dwellen ·Hm.4.30-38: A drypoint shield is inscribed in the right margin.
fol. 126vI
fol. 127rI
Hm.4.96KD.4.97
for y woll wagen for wrongeHm.4.96: A raised point is added over the erased <e>. · he woll do so nomore
fol. 127vI
¶ And ȝetteHm.4.133: The original scribe wrote ȝette. A corrector erased the final <te> and restroked the first <t>. quod resoun by the rode · y schall no rewthe haue
Hm.4.168KD.4.169
for ofte haue y quod ...sheHm.4.168: The spelling, inserted over an erasure probably by hand3, is unique in this manuscript for she. Hand1's and hand2's normal spelling is sche. · holpen ȝowe atte barre
fol. 128rI
Hm.4.192KD.4.193
so conscyence be of oure conseyl · y kepe no bettreHm.4.192: After this line, all other manuscripts contain a line not found in Hm, here given in the spelling of L: And I graunt quod the kynge goddes forbode it faile. Perhaps the omission is due to an eye-skip, for both the omitted line and the next begin (in most manuscripts) with the
letter A. Despite the omission, the lines make perfect syntactic sense, though now the final line would have to be spoken by Reason
rather than the King, whose words begin the omitted line. ·